Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3375 is the better pick — it scores 73/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U's 64, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3375

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 38
Core Specifications Threads: 76
Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 270 W (32% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U	Winner
Core Specifications	52	44	Intel Xeon W 3375
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	84	73	Intel Xeon W 3375

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U is an Ice Lake-based processor listed in a general series overview of Intel Xeon chips. Its specifications are presented on a list detailing processors for various compute roles, such as cloud or data center use.

Best for general compute

Pros

Features 32 cores and 64 threads
Equipped with 48 MB L3 cache
Has an LGA 4189 socket interface on the Ice Lake-W variant

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U48,916

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Cores	38	32
Threads	76	64
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz9% more	2.3 GHz
Base Power Consumption	270 W32% more	205 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz18% more	3.4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	3,040 KB19% more	2,560 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB19% more	40 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB19% more	48 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	10 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
PassMark CPU Mark	58,68620% more	48,916

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 80/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6314U — a 5-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and Intel Xeon Gold 6314U are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 80/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6314U.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out Intel Xeon Gold 6314U (80/100). But if Intel Xeon Gold 6314U is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.