Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the better pick — it scores 71/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U's 65, leading on Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C leads overall

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 300 W (46% more)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.9 GHz (26% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 56,202 (15% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Category	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U	Winner
Core Specifications	48	48	Tie
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	82	74	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U is an Ice Lake-based processor listed in a general series overview of Intel Xeon chips. Its specifications are presented on a list detailing processors for various compute roles, such as cloud or data center use.

Best for general compute

Pros

Features 32 cores and 64 threads
Equipped with 48 MB L3 cache
Has an LGA 4189 socket interface on the Ice Lake-W variant

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U48,916

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Cores	32	32
Threads	64	64
Base Frequency	2.9 GHz26% more	2.3 GHz
Base Power Consumption	300 W46% more	205 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz3% more	3.4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,560 KB	2,560 KB
L2 Cache	40 MB	40 MB
L3 Cache	54 MB13% more	48 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	10 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
PassMark CPU Mark	56,20215% more	48,916

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C rates higher at 84/100 versus 80/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6314U — a 4-point lead. Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and Intel Xeon Gold 6314U are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 80/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6314U.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) edges out Intel Xeon Gold 6314U (80/100). But if Intel Xeon Gold 6314U is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.