Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the better pick — it scores 79/100 to the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M's 51, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C leads overall

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 300 W (82% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 40 MB (67% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 56,202 (62% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Category	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M	Winner
Core Specifications	63	37	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	86	59	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

The Intel Xeon Platinum series represents a line of high-end microprocessors. These CPUs are listed within the broader categorization of Intel Xeon processors by generation.

Best for High performance computingBest for Enterprise applications

Pros

Platinum is mentioned as a class of processor in multiple generations (e.g., Skylake-based, Comet Lake-based, Ice Lake-based)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M34,592

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Cores	32	24
Threads	64	48
Base Frequency	2.9 GHz21% more	2.4 GHz
Base Power Consumption	300 W82% more	165 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz11% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,560 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	40 MB67% more	24 MB
L3 Cache	54 MB51% more	35.75 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm29% less	14 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
PassMark CPU Mark	56,20262% more	34,592

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C rates higher at 84/100 versus 66/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M — a 18-point lead. Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 66/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) edges out Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (66/100). But if Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.