AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc 140V

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140V are closely matched at 32 and 32/100. The AMD Radeon 760M edges ahead on Theoretical Performance, while the Intel Arc 140V leads on Core Specifications — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140V are closely matched overall (within 1 points).
  • AMD Radeon 760M stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 5.325 TFLOPS (33% more).
  • Intel Arc 140V counters with Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (25% less).
AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140V are closely matched
AMD Radeon 760M
32
Intel Arc 140V
32
Where AMD Radeon 760M stands out
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 5.325 TFLOPS (33% more)
Where Intel Arc 140V stands out
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (25% less)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Radeon 760M

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor built for mainstream mobile computing platforms and compact laptops. Operating directly within the host APU without dedicated video memory, it caters to users needing power-efficient performance for routine office tasks, video playback, and entry-level gaming.

Best for Everyday productivity and high-definition video streamingBest for Casual gaming on ultra-portable laptops
Pros
  • Lower power consumption compared to standalone discrete graphics cards
  • Allows for thinner and lighter laptop chassis designs
  • Sufficient graphical performance for light gaming and multimedia tasks
Cons
  • Shares system RAM rather than utilizing dedicated video memory
  • Struggles with demanding modern AAA gaming titles at high settings

Intel Arc 140V

The Intel Arc 140V is an integrated graphics solution built on an advanced 3nm manufacturing process. Designed primarily for thin-and-light laptops, it operates on a shared memory architecture and reaches maximum core frequencies of up to 2.05 GHz. It includes broad modern graphics API support, including DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3.0, catering to everyday computing and light graphical workloads.

Best for Casual 1080p gaming on compact, lightweight laptopsBest for Hardware-accelerated media playback and general productivity tasks
Pros
  • Built on an efficient 3nm lithography process
  • Reaches maximum boost clock speeds of up to 2.05 GHz
  • Supports modern graphics APIs including DirectX 12 and OpenCL 3.0
Cons
  • Relies entirely on shared system memory rather than fast dedicated VRAM
  • Lower overall performance tier compared to dedicated graphics cards

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Radeon 760M

Intel Arc 140V

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Radeon 760M5,290
Intel Arc 140V5,149

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc 140V comparison

They are closely matched: AMD Radeon 760M scores 27/100 and Intel Arc 140V scores 27/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 140V are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 27/100 for AMD Radeon 760M and 27/100 for Intel Arc 140V.
It's close — AMD Radeon 760M (27/100) and Intel Arc 140V (27/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote