Apple M1 GPU vs Intel Arc 140V

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Arc 140V is the better pick — it scores 41/100 to the Apple M1 GPU's 34, leading on Core Specifications and API Support. Choose the Apple M1 GPU instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Apple M1 GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Arc 140V leads Apple M1 GPU overall by 7 points (41 vs 34 out of 100).
  • Intel Arc 140V stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 3.994 TFLOPS (54% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (40% less).
Intel Arc 140V leads overall
Intel Arc 140V
41
Apple M1 GPU
34
Why it stands out
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 3.994 TFLOPS (54% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (40% less)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Apple M1 GPU

The Apple M1 is a series of ARM-based systems-on-a-chip that features an integrated GPU ranging from 7 to 64 cores depending on the specific chip tier. Manufactured using TSMC's 5 nm process, this hardware integrates the graphics processor, CPU, and system memory onto a single die. It is designed to deliver energy-efficient graphics performance across Apple's laptops, compact desktops, and high-end tablets.

Best for Portable creative work such as video and photo editing on laptops and tablets…Best for Silent or fanless computing configurations that require modest graphical…
Pros
  • Unified memory architecture allows the GPU and CPU to share the same high-speed memory pool directly.
  • Scalable graphics performance options ranging from 7-core and 8-core designs in entry-level models to 64-core configurations in workstation chips.
  • Built on an efficient 5 nm process node that delivers high graphics throughput relative to its power consumption.
Cons
  • The integrated design prevents post-purchase graphics or memory upgrades.
  • Base configurations are restricted to a maximum of 8 or 12 GB of unified memory shared between the CPU and GPU.

Intel Arc 140V

The Intel Arc 140V is an integrated graphics solution built on an advanced 3nm manufacturing process. Designed primarily for thin-and-light laptops, it operates on a shared memory architecture and reaches maximum core frequencies of up to 2.05 GHz. It includes broad modern graphics API support, including DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3.0, catering to everyday computing and light graphical workloads.

Best for Casual 1080p gaming on compact, lightweight laptopsBest for Hardware-accelerated media playback and general productivity tasks
Pros
  • Built on an efficient 3nm lithography process
  • Reaches maximum boost clock speeds of up to 2.05 GHz
  • Supports modern graphics APIs including DirectX 12 and OpenCL 3.0
Cons
  • Relies entirely on shared system memory rather than fast dedicated VRAM
  • Lower overall performance tier compared to dedicated graphics cards

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M1 GPU vs Intel Arc 140V comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M1 GPU scores 29/100 and Intel Arc 140V scores 27/100 in our overall comparison — within 2 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M1 GPU and Intel Arc 140V are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 29/100 for Apple M1 GPU and 27/100 for Intel Arc 140V.
It's close — Apple M1 GPU (29/100) and Intel Arc 140V (27/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote