Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is the better pick — it scores 47/100 to the Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)'s 36, leading on API Support and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) instead if core specifications and memory matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 leads overall

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)

Why it stands out

Miscellaneous Platform: Desktop
API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more)
Memory Bandwidth: 128 GB/s (7% more)

Winner by category for Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Category	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)	Winner
Core Specifications	59	86	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)
Memory	36	55	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)
API Support	77	47	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Theoretical Performance	39	44	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)
Benchmark	37	20	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Miscellaneous	89	22	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)

The Apple M4 is an advanced System-on-a-chip designed by Apple that integrates CPU, GPU, NPU, and other components onto a single piece of silicon. It represents the latest iteration in the Apple Silicon series, optimized for high performance across various devices including iMacs and MacBooks. Models featuring 10 cores are geared toward users who require significant power for demanding creative or computational workloads.

Best for creative professionalsBest for developersBest for advanced media consumption

Pros

The architecture is built on TSMC's advanced 3nm process.
It provides enhanced hardware acceleration features, including ray tracing support.
Performance analysis indicates a strong single-core performance advantage.
The integrated Neural Engine significantly boosts processing throughput (NPU) compared to predecessors.

Cons

The M4 series utilizes an ARMv9.2a architecture, which differs from some specialized instruction set extensions.
While powerful, its full memory potential varies depending on the specific model variant and bandwidth available.
Its introduction timeline established it as a successor in a rapidly evolving silicon landscape.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is an entry-level desktop graphics card built on TSMC's 12nm FinFET process and powered by the Turing-based TU117 processor (specifically the TU117-300 chip). Operating at a low 75W thermal design power, it features 896 CUDA cores paired with 4GB of memory over a 128-bit bus in GDDR5 and GDDR6 variants. It was designed for budget-conscious gamers seeking basic 1080p performance without needing extensive power supply upgrades.

Best for Budget 1080p gaming rigs running on standard PCIe slot powerBest for Compact PC builds constrained by modest power supplies

Pros

Low 75W power requirement suitable for entry-level desktop builds
Available with 4GB of GDDR5 or faster GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus
Efficient Turing architecture built on TSMC 12nm FinFET technology

Cons

Lacks dedicated hardware RT and Tensor cores for real-time ray tracing and AI tasks
Uses an older Volta-generation NVENC video encoder rather than the upgraded Turing encoder
Discontinued product line offering limited headroom for modern demanding titles

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)

Check Price on Amazon

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Check Price on Amazon

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Base Frequency	N/A	1.485 GHz
Base Power	N/A	N/A
Maximum Frequency	N/A	1.665 GHz
Maximum Power	N/A	75 W
Lithography Process	3 nm75% less	12 nm

Memory

Feature	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Capacity	16 GB300% more	4 GB
Technology
Bus Width	N/A	128 bit
Bandwidth	120 GB/s	128 GB/s7% more
Is Shared	Yes	No

API Support

Feature	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX Version	N/A	12
OpenGL Version	4.1	4.6
Vulkan Version	1.3	1.48% more
OpenCL Version	3	3

Theoretical Performance

Feature	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Pixel Rate	113.6 GP/s	53.28 GP/s
Texture Rate	113.6 GT/s	93.24 GT/s
Performance (FP16)	7.1 TFLOPS19% more	5.97 TFLOPS
Performance (FP32)	3.55 TFLOPS19% more	2.98 TFLOPS
Performance (FP64)	N/A	93.1 GFLOPS

Benchmark

Feature	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark	N/A	7,865

Miscellaneous

Feature	Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Release Date	May 15, 2024	April 23, 2019
Platform

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) scores 34/100 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 scores 34/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 34/100 for Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) and 34/100 for Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650.

It's close — Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) (34/100) and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (34/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.