Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm Adreno GPU

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is the better pick — it scores 46/100 to the Qualcomm Adreno GPU's 36, leading on Benchmark and Miscellaneous. Choose the Qualcomm Adreno GPU instead if core specifications and memory matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Qualcomm Adreno GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 leads Qualcomm Adreno GPU overall by 10 points (46 vs 36 out of 100).
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 stands out on Memory Bandwidth: 128 GB/s (91% more), Miscellaneous Platform: Desktop, API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more).
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 leads overall
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
46
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
36
Why it stands out
  • Memory Bandwidth: 128 GB/s (91% more)
  • Miscellaneous Platform: Desktop
  • API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is an entry-level desktop graphics card built on TSMC's 12nm FinFET process and powered by the Turing-based TU117 processor (specifically the TU117-300 chip). Operating at a low 75W thermal design power, it features 896 CUDA cores paired with 4GB of memory over a 128-bit bus in GDDR5 and GDDR6 variants. It was designed for budget-conscious gamers seeking basic 1080p performance without needing extensive power supply upgrades.

Best for Budget 1080p gaming rigs running on standard PCIe slot powerBest for Compact PC builds constrained by modest power supplies
Pros
  • Low 75W power requirement suitable for entry-level desktop builds
  • Available with 4GB of GDDR5 or faster GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus
  • Efficient Turing architecture built on TSMC 12nm FinFET technology
Cons
  • Lacks dedicated hardware RT and Tensor cores for real-time ray tracing and AI tasks
  • Uses an older Volta-generation NVENC video encoder rather than the upgraded Turing encoder
  • Discontinued product line offering limited headroom for modern demanding titles

Qualcomm Adreno GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno GPU is an integrated graphics processor built on a 4nm lithography process, designed for mobile and embedded platforms. Released in late 2023, it features 8 GB of shared system memory and achieves up to 4.6 TFLOPS of FP32 theoretical performance. It is intended for devices requiring efficient graphics rendering and modern API support within a low-power envelope.

Best for Power-conscious mobile graphics workloads requiring modern Vulkan 1.3 or DirectXBest for Compact integrated devices needing efficient FP16 and FP32 compute capabilities
Pros
  • Supports modern graphics APIs including Vulkan 1.3, DirectX 12.1, and OpenCL 3.0
  • Built on an efficient 4nm manufacturing process
  • Delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS of half-precision (FP16) compute performance
Cons
  • Relies on a shared memory architecture with a relatively modest 67 GB/s bandwidth
  • Operates at a low maximum clock frequency of 0.68 GHz

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Qualcomm Adreno GPU

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm Adreno GPU comparison

They are closely matched: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 scores 34/100 and Qualcomm Adreno GPU scores 33/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 34/100 for Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and 33/100 for Qualcomm Adreno GPU.
It's close — Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (34/100) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU (33/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote