They are closely matched: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 scores 34/100 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 scores 34/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 are closely matched at 41 and 39/100. The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 edges ahead on Memory and Miscellaneous, while the Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 leads on Core Specifications and Theoretical Performance — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 stands out on Miscellaneous Platform: Desktop.
- Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 counters with Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 15.155 TFLOPS (154% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 7.578 TFLOPS (154% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (75% less).
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 are closely matched
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
41
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
39
Where Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 stands out
- Miscellaneous Platform: Desktop
Where Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 stands out
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 15.155 TFLOPS (154% more)
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 7.578 TFLOPS (154% more)
- Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (75% less)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is an entry-level desktop graphics card built on TSMC's 12nm FinFET process and powered by the Turing-based TU117 processor (specifically the TU117-300 chip). Operating at a low 75W thermal design power, it features 896 CUDA cores paired with 4GB of memory over a 128-bit bus in GDDR5 and GDDR6 variants. It was designed for budget-conscious gamers seeking basic 1080p performance without needing extensive power supply upgrades.
Best for Budget 1080p gaming rigs running on standard PCIe slot powerBest for Compact PC builds constrained by modest power supplies
Pros
- Low 75W power requirement suitable for entry-level desktop builds
- Available with 4GB of GDDR5 or faster GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus
- Efficient Turing architecture built on TSMC 12nm FinFET technology
Cons
- Lacks dedicated hardware RT and Tensor cores for real-time ray tracing and AI tasks
- Uses an older Volta-generation NVENC video encoder rather than the upgraded Turing encoder
- Discontinued product line offering limited headroom for modern demanding titles
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
The Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is an integrated graphics processor designed for highly portable and efficient computing devices. It is engineered to deliver a balance of everyday graphical capability and power efficiency, highlighted by a G3D Mark benchmark score of 9500. This GPU is primarily suited for users seeking capable multimedia performance in slim form factors without the high power consumption of dedicated graphics hardware.
Best for Casual gaming and multimedia consumption on highly portable devicesBest for Users prioritizing long battery life over heavy graphics-processing power
Pros
- Achieves a G3D Mark score of 9500, indicating solid performance for an integrated GPU class
- Optimized for thermal efficiency and low power consumption in compact devices
- Capable of handling everyday productivity, high-definition media streaming, and casual gaming
Cons
- Cannot compete with dedicated graphics cards for intensive 3D rendering or modern AAA gaming
- Lacks dedicated video memory (VRAM), relying instead on shared system memory
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Nvidia GeForce GTX 16507,865
Qualcomm Adreno X2-907,723
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 34/100 for Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and 34/100 for Qualcomm Adreno X2-90.
It's close — Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (34/100) and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (34/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
VS
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Super
VS