MSI Raider 18 HX AI (2025)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI (2025)
VS
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
Titan 18 HX AI (2025) wins 7 of 14 categories · ProArt P16 (H7607) wins 3
| Category | Titan 18 HX AI (2025)ProArt P16 (H7607) | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Display | Tie | |
| Performance | +80 | |
| Battery | +8 | |
| Memory | +42 | |
| Design & Weight | +60 | |
| Processor | +87 | |
| Storage | +13 | |
| Discrete Graphics | +90 | |
| Ports | +26 | |
| Connectivity | Tie | |
| Webcam | Tie | |
| Security | +28 | |
| Sound | +20 | |
| Input | Tie |
Titan 18 HX AI (2025) is 1.83 kg (103%) heavier than ProArt P16 (H7607).
Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).
Compromises to know before you buy
No notable compromises found.
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
Processor model | N/A |
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
Discrete graphics model | N/A | |
3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 23,165 | N/A |
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
Memory capacity | 64 GB | N/A |
Technology |
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
Storage capacity | 4 TB | N/A |
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
Size | 18 in13% more | 16 in |
Display resolution | 3840 × 2400 px | N/A |
Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
Response time | 15 ms | 0.2 ms99% less |
Display type | ||
Brightness | 1,000 nits | N/A |
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
Battery capacity | 99.9 Wh | 99.9 Wh |
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
Weight | 3.6 kg | 1.77 kg51% less |
| Feature | Titan 18 HX AI (2025) | ProArt P16 (H7607) |
|---|---|---|
PassMark CPU Mark | 56,272 | N/A |
Active cooling | Yes | N/A |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.