ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP vs BenQ PD2730S

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is the better pick — it scores 69/100 to the BenQ PD2730S's 45, leading on Performance and HDR. Choose the BenQ PD2730S instead if image quality matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP leads overall

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

BenQ PD2730S

Why it stands out

Performance Refresh Rate: 480 Hz (700% more)
Peak Brightness (HDR): 1,300 nits (225% more)
Connectivity HDMI Ports: 2 (100% more)

Watch-outs

Compromises to know before you buy

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

No notable compromises found.

BenQ PD2730S

60 Hz — no high-refresh gaming.

Winner by category for ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP vs BenQ PD2730S
Category	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	BenQ PD2730S	Winner
Panel	57	55	Tie
Image Quality	50	58	BenQ PD2730S
Performance	86	14	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP
HDR	86	14	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP
Connectivity	65	52	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP
Ergonomics	85	85	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is a 31.5-inch WOLED gaming monitor designed for competitive gamers and power users requiring both high resolution and ultra-fast frame rates. It features a Dual Mode feature that switches between native 4K at 240Hz and Full HD at 480Hz, alongside an anti-glare screen treatment and a 0.03ms response time. Connectivity includes HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, and a USB-C hub supporting 90W Power Delivery and integrated KVM functionality.

Best for Competitive esports players needing a 480Hz refresh rate in high-tempo shootersBest for Multi-device setups requiring high-wattage USB-C laptop charging and seamless KV

Pros

Dual-mode refresh rate offering 4K at 240Hz or FHD at 480Hz
Near-instantaneous 0.03ms GTG response time for minimal motion blur
USB-C connectivity featuring 90W Power Delivery and a built-in KVM switch
High contrast WOLED panel with 99% DCI-P3 color coverage and 1,300 cd/m² peak HDR brightness

Cons

Lacks integrated speakers
Relies on DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC rather than DP 2.1
Limited stand height adjustment range of 80mm

BenQ PD2730S

The BenQ PD2730S is a 27-inch 4K UHD display engineered for color-critical digital tasks and creative professionals. It features a 3840x2160 resolution panel paired with USB-C connectivity and ergonomic stand options. Designed with Mac users and visual artists in mind, it prioritizes color accuracy and seamless desktop integration.

Best for Color-critical photo editing and graphic designBest for Mac desktop workstation setups requiring single-cable USB-C connectivity

Pros

High-density 4K UHD (3840x2160) resolution on a 27-inch panel
USB-C connectivity tailored for modern laptop and Mac setups
Ergonomic stand featuring height adjustment functionality

Cons

Focused on productivity and color precision rather than high-refresh-rate gaming features

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

Check Price on Amazon

BenQ PD2730S

Check Price on Amazon

Physical Comparison

Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDPBenQ PD2730S

BenQ PD2730S is 1.1 kg (24%) heavier than ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Panel

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	BenQ PD2730S
Screen Size	31.5 in17% more	27 in
Resolution	3840 × 2160 px	5120 × 2880 px
Panel Type
Aspect Ratio	16:9	16:9
Pixel Density	140	21856% more
Curved	No	N/A
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	89%

Image Quality

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	BenQ PD2730S
Brightness (typical)	N/A	400 nits
Contrast Ratio	1500000:1	2000:1
Color Gamut (DCI-P3)	99	98
Color Depth	10-bit	N/A

Performance

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	BenQ PD2730S
Refresh Rate	480 Hz700% more	60 Hz
Response Time (GtG)	0.03 ms99% less	5 ms
Adaptive Sync	FreeSync Premium Pro / G-Sync Compatible	N/A

HDR

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	BenQ PD2730S
HDR Format	HDR10, DisplayHDR True Black 400	HDR10, DisplayHDR 400
Peak Brightness (HDR)	1,300 nits225% more	400 nits

Connectivity

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	BenQ PD2730S
HDMI Ports	2100% more	1
DisplayPort	1	1
USB-C	Yes	Yes
Power Delivery	90 W	90 W
USB Hub	Yes	Yes

Ergonomics

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	BenQ PD2730S
Height Adjustment	Yes	Yes
VESA Mount	100 × 100 px	100 × 100 px
Built-in Speakers	No	Yes
Dimensions (without stand)	71.4 × 43.0 × 7.1 cm	61.4 × 36.8 × 7.74 cm
Weight (without stand)	4.5 kg	5.6 kg
Release Date	July 31, 2024	N/A

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP vs BenQ PD2730S comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP rates higher at 83/100 versus 47/100 for BenQ PD2730S — a 36-point lead. ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP and BenQ PD2730S are compared side by side above across every spec in the monitors category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 83/100 for ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP and 47/100 for BenQ PD2730S.

If you want the higher-rated monitors option overall, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP (83/100) edges out BenQ PD2730S (47/100). But if BenQ PD2730S is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.