ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP vs Gigabyte M27Q

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is the better pick — it scores 72/100 to the Gigabyte M27Q's 45, leading on Panel and Performance. Choose the Gigabyte M27Q instead if image quality matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP leads overall

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

Gigabyte M27Q

Why it stands out

Performance Refresh Rate: 480 Hz (182% more)
Peak Brightness (HDR): 1,300 nits (225% more)
Performance Response Time (GtG): 0.03 ms (94% less)

Winner by category for ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP vs Gigabyte M27Q
Category	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	Gigabyte M27Q	Winner
Panel	65	47	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP
Image Quality	53	56	Gigabyte M27Q
Performance	85	15	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP
HDR	86	14	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP
Connectivity	71	62	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP
Ergonomics	85	85	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is a 31.5-inch WOLED gaming monitor designed for competitive gamers and power users requiring both high resolution and ultra-fast frame rates. It features a Dual Mode feature that switches between native 4K at 240Hz and Full HD at 480Hz, alongside an anti-glare screen treatment and a 0.03ms response time. Connectivity includes HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, and a USB-C hub supporting 90W Power Delivery and integrated KVM functionality.

Best for Competitive esports players needing a 480Hz refresh rate in high-tempo shootersBest for Multi-device setups requiring high-wattage USB-C laptop charging and seamless KV

Pros

Dual-mode refresh rate offering 4K at 240Hz or FHD at 480Hz
Near-instantaneous 0.03ms GTG response time for minimal motion blur
USB-C connectivity featuring 90W Power Delivery and a built-in KVM switch
High contrast WOLED panel with 99% DCI-P3 color coverage and 1,300 cd/m² peak HDR brightness

Cons

Lacks integrated speakers
Relies on DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC rather than DP 2.1
Limited stand height adjustment range of 80mm

Gigabyte M27Q

The Gigabyte M27Q is a 27-inch gaming monitor that combines a 1440p resolution with a fast 170Hz refresh rate. Designed primarily for budget-conscious users, it balances fluid motion performance with practical productivity features. A key defining hardware inclusion is its integrated KVM switch, which lets users control two separate computers with a single mouse and keyboard setup.

Best for Smooth 1440p gaming on a budgetBest for Multitaskers wishing to share peripherals between a work laptop and a gaming…

Pros

High 170Hz refresh rate combined with FreeSync support to eliminate screen tearing
Built-in KVM switch and USB-C port facilitate quick switching between two active devices
Excellent value offering fast pixel response times and color performance for gaming

Cons

Varying text clarity depending on the specific panel revision of the monitor

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

Check Price on Amazon

Gigabyte M27Q

Check Price on Amazon

Physical Comparison

Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDPGigabyte M27Q

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is 1 kg (29%) heavier than Gigabyte M27Q.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Panel

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	Gigabyte M27Q
Screen Size	31.5 in17% more	27 in
Resolution	3840 × 2160 px	2560 × 1440 px
Panel Type
Aspect Ratio	16:9	16:9
Pixel Density	14028% more	109
Curved	No	No
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	89%

Image Quality

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	Gigabyte M27Q
Brightness (typical)	N/A	350 nits
Contrast Ratio	1500000:1	1000:1
Color Gamut (DCI-P3)	998% more	92
Color Depth	10-bit	8-bit

Performance

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	Gigabyte M27Q
Refresh Rate	480 Hz182% more	170 Hz
Response Time (GtG)	0.03 ms94% less	0.5 ms
Adaptive Sync	FreeSync Premium Pro / G-Sync Compatible	FreeSync Premium

HDR

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	Gigabyte M27Q
HDR Format	HDR10, DisplayHDR True Black 400	HDR400
Peak Brightness (HDR)	1,300 nits225% more	400 nits

Connectivity

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	Gigabyte M27Q
HDMI Ports	2	2
DisplayPort	1	1
USB-C	Yes	Yes
Power Delivery	90 W	N/A
USB Hub	Yes	Yes

Ergonomics

Feature	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP	Gigabyte M27Q
Height Adjustment	Yes	Yes
VESA Mount	100 × 100 px	100 × 100 px
Built-in Speakers	No	No
Dimensions (without stand)	71.4 × 43.0 × 7.1 cm	61.5 × 36.7 × 4.2 cm
Weight (without stand)	4.5 kg	3.5 kg
Release Date	July 31, 2024	N/A

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP vs Gigabyte M27Q comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP rates higher at 83/100 versus 66/100 for Gigabyte M27Q — a 17-point lead. ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP and Gigabyte M27Q are compared side by side above across every spec in the monitors category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 83/100 for ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP and 66/100 for Gigabyte M27Q.

If you want the higher-rated monitors option overall, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP (83/100) edges out Gigabyte M27Q (66/100). But if Gigabyte M27Q is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.