Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are closely matched at 70 and 69/100. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 edges ahead on Chip and Display, while the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads on Memory and Rear Camera — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are closely matched overall (within 1 point).
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 stands out on Miscellaneous Dust & Water resistance: IP48, Benchmark Geekbench multi-core score: 6,757 (41% more), Benchmark Antutu score: 1,608,744 (32% more).
  • Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold counters with Rear Camera Optical zoom: 5 (67% more), Display Resolution: 2076 × 2152 px, Connectivity Wi-Fi technology: Wi-Fi 7.
  • Best value: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (from $1,799) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are closely matched
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
70
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
69
Where Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 stands out
  • Miscellaneous Dust & Water resistance: IP48
  • Benchmark Geekbench multi-core score: 6,757 (41% more)
  • Benchmark Antutu score: 1,608,744 (32% more)
Where Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold stands out
  • Rear Camera Optical zoom: 5 (67% more)
  • Display Resolution: 2076 × 2152 px
  • Connectivity Wi-Fi technology: Wi-Fi 7

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a premium foldable smartphone designed for users wanting an expansive dual-screen experience in a slimmer form factor. It is powered by the Google Tensor G4 processor and features 16 GB of LPDDR5 RAM alongside a 4650 mAh battery. This device moves away from its predecessor's passport-style layout, offering a taller cover screen and refined hinge design.

Best for Side-by-side app multitasking on an expansive inner screenBest for Foldable enthusiasts who want a standard, natural-feeling cover display ratioBest for Mobile photographers who prefer realistic computational image processing
Pros
  • Significantly brighter internal and external displays
  • Thinner and more refined physical design than the original model
  • Solid battery life compared to direct foldable competitors
  • Clean software experience with advanced on-device AI features
Cons
  • High retail entry price of $1,800
  • Slow battery charging speeds
  • Heats up quickly during intense tasks like gaming
  • Camera hardware is less advanced than the standard Pixel 9 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 is a premium book-style folding smartphone engineered for demanding users who require a highly portable productivity workstation. Now in its sixth design generation, this iteration prioritizes software polish and structural maturity over major hardware breakthroughs. While it excels as a pocket-sized computer, it introduces a price increase without offering major redesigns to its external display or camera layout.

Best for Multi-day business trips where a user wants to leave their laptop behindBest for Mobile power users who value mature software execution and multitasking over…
Pros
  • High level of physical and software maturity gained from multiple generations of refinement
  • Excellent multitasking capabilities that can handle a full workload as a temporary laptop replacement during travel
Cons
  • Higher entry price despite offering only minor, iterative upgrades over the previous generation
  • Fails to include anticipated hardware enhancements such as an integrated stylus slot, a 5x telephoto camera, or a wider outer screen

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold1,222,228
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 61,608,744

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Battery capacity

Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold4,650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 64,400 mAh

Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.

Physical Comparison

Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D

257 g239 g
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is 18 g (8%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 comparison

They are closely matched: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold scores 76/100 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 scores 76/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 are compared side by side above across every spec in the smartphones category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 76/100 for Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and 76/100 for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6.
At launch, Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold was the more affordable option ($1799) versus Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 ($1900). Weigh that against the overall scores (76/100 vs 76/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
It's close — Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (76/100) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 (76/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote