Based on our overall comparison score, Vivo X300 Pro rates higher at 87/100 versus 75/100 for Motorola Razr 50 Ultra — a 12-point lead. Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Vivo X300 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Vivo X300 Pro is the better pick — it scores 79/100 to the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra's 65, leading on Chip and Memory. Choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra instead if design & weight matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra overall by 14 points (79 vs 65 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Storage capacity: 1,024 GB (100% more), Benchmark Antutu score: 2,982,875 (162% more), Benchmark Geekbench multi-core score: 10,264 (131% more).
- Best value: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (from $1,000) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Vivo X300 Pro leads overall
Vivo X300 Pro
79
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
65
Why it stands out
- Storage capacity: 1,024 GB (100% more)
- Benchmark Antutu score: 2,982,875 (162% more)
- Benchmark Geekbench multi-core score: 10,264 (131% more)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.
Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro is a flagship smartphone designed for power users who prioritize high-end mobile photography and robust battery life. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor and features a brilliant 6.78-inch LTPO OLED display. With its heavy-duty zoom camera and robust water protection, it aims to compete at the very top of the premium market.
Best for High-detail zoom and close-up macro mobile photographyBest for Outdoor enthusiasts needing a highly water-resistant device with a very bright…Best for Power users wanting high-speed 90W wired charging paired with strong overall…
Pros
- Highly advanced triple-lens camera setup featuring a 200 MP periscope telephoto sensor
- Generous 6510 mAh battery capacity on the global variant for extended multi-day use
- Superb outdoor visibility with a display that peaks at 4500 nits
- Dual IP68 and IP69 ratings offering protection against both immersion and high-pressure water jets
Cons
- Relatively heavy in the hand, weighing 226 grams
- European model gets a substantially smaller 5440 mAh battery compared to the global version
- Lacks support for expandable storage options
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a premium clamshell foldable smartphone designed for users seeking an expansive outer display experience and modern AI features. It is driven by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor and boasts a large 4-inch cover screen with a 165Hz refresh rate alongside Google Gemini support. Key upgrades also include a refreshed camera array and an increased battery capacity.
Best for Interactive cover screen multitaskingBest for Mobile photography with a telephoto zoom requirement in a foldable form factor
Pros
- Large, highly fluid 4-inch outer display with a 165Hz refresh rate
- Upgraded dual-camera configuration featuring a 50MP main sensor and a telephoto lens
- Enhanced battery system with a 4,000mAh capacity and faster wired charging
- Deep software integration with out-of-the-box Google Gemini support
Cons
- The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset can struggle to maintain perfectly smooth frame rates during intensive gaming tasks like Genshin Impact
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Pro2,982,875
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra1,140,567
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra4,000 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro is 37 g (20%) heavier than Motorola Razr 50 Ultra.
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Vivo X300 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra comparison
Vivo X300 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra are compared side by side above across every spec in the smartphones category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 87/100 for Vivo X300 Pro and 75/100 for Motorola Razr 50 Ultra.
At launch, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra was the more affordable option ($1000) versus Vivo X300 Pro ($1399). Weigh that against the overall scores (87/100 vs 75/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
If you want the higher-rated smartphones option overall, Vivo X300 Pro (87/100) edges out Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (75/100). But if Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
VS
Vivo X300
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Vivo X100 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
Honor Magic V6
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
Honor Magic V6
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
VS
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Oppo Find X9 Pro
VS
OnePlus 15T
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
OnePlus 15T
VS
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
VS