Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick — it scores 78/100 to the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G's 62, leading on Chip and Memory. Choose the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G instead if front camera and design & weight matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.
Our overall take, at a glance
Compromises to know before you buy
No notable compromises found.
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a high-end flagship smartphone designed for mobile photography enthusiasts and power users looking for professional-grade imaging capabilities. It is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor paired with LPDDR5X memory, featuring a large 6.82-inch 144Hz LTPO AMOLED display and an advanced multi-sensor camera array anchored by a 200MP main sensor and a 200MP periscope telephoto lens.
The Samsung Galaxy A57 5G is a mid-range Android smartphone released in 2026, aimed at users who want robust everyday performance and display quality. It is equipped with the octa-core Exynos 1680 processor and features a large 6.7-inch Super AMOLED+ display. Key design strengths include an IP68 dust and water resistance rating and a massive 5000mAh battery.
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Higher benchmark score = faster
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 Ultra is 53 g (30%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy A57 5G.
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
The full spec sheet, side by side
Common questions about Vivo X300 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A57 5G comparison
Explore more product comparisons