Based on our overall comparison score, Vivo X300 Ultra rates higher at 83/100 versus 74/100 for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE — a 9-point lead. Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick — it scores 78/100 to the Samsung Galaxy S26 FE's 66, leading on Chip and Memory. Choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 FE instead if front camera and design & weight matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S26 FE overall by 12 points (78 vs 66 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Ultra stands out on Memory RAM capacity: 12 GB (50% more), Storage capacity: 256 GB (100% more), Display Size: 6.82 in (2% more).
Vivo X300 Ultra leads overall
Vivo X300 Ultra
78
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
66
Why it stands out
- Memory RAM capacity: 12 GB (50% more)
- Storage capacity: 256 GB (100% more)
- Display Size: 6.82 in (2% more)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a high-end flagship smartphone designed for mobile photography enthusiasts and power users looking for professional-grade imaging capabilities. It is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor paired with LPDDR5X memory, featuring a large 6.82-inch 144Hz LTPO AMOLED display and an advanced multi-sensor camera array anchored by a 200MP main sensor and a 200MP periscope telephoto lens.
Best for long-range and telephoto mobile photographyBest for high-frame-rate 4K and 8K video captureBest for all-day heavy multimedia usage
Pros
- Extensive multi-focal length camera setup featuring high-resolution 200MP main and telephoto sensors with OIS
- High-capacity 6600mAh battery supporting 100W wired and 40W wireless charging
- Vibrant 6.82-inch LTPO AMOLED display with adaptive 1-144Hz refresh rate and Dolby Vision support
- Robust performance driven by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip and UFS 4.1 storage
Cons
- Bulky physical footprint with a weight of 232g or more depending on the finish
- Lacks expandable storage via a microSD card slot
- Absence of a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is a sub-flagship smartphone designed for users seeking premium features at a more accessible tier. Powered by the Samsung Exynos 2500 processor, the device comes equipped with a substantial 4900 mAh battery and support for 45W wired charging. It distinguishes itself by launching natively with Android 17 and One UI 9.0, while also supporting modern wireless standards like Qi2.
Best for All-day battery enduranceBest for Magnetic wireless charging via Qi2 accessoriesBest for High-speed home internet via Wi-Fi 7
Pros
- Large 4900 mAh battery capacity matching the larger S26+ flagship
- Fast 45W wired charging and modern Qi2 wireless charging support
- Ships out of the box with the newer Android 17 operating system
Cons
- Equipped with the older or lower-tier Exynos 2500 chipset rather than the Snapdragon 8 Elite or Exynos 2600
- Slightly heavier footprint at 193 grams compared to the standard S26
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Ultra2,723,497
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE2,119,022
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Ultra6,600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE4,900 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 UltraSamsung Galaxy S26 FE
Vivo X300 Ultra is 39 g (20%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy S26 FE.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Vivo X300 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26 FE comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26 FE are compared side by side above across every spec in the smartphones category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 83/100 for Vivo X300 Ultra and 74/100 for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE.
If you want the higher-rated smartphones option overall, Vivo X300 Ultra (83/100) edges out Samsung Galaxy S26 FE (74/100). But if Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
VS
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
VS
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
VS
Vivo X300
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
VS
Vivo X100 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S26
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
VS
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
VS