Based on our overall comparison score, Vivo X300 Ultra rates higher at 83/100 versus 79/100 for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — a 4-point lead. Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick — it scores 77/100 to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7's 70, leading on Chip and Display. Choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 instead if front camera and design & weight matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 overall by 7 points (77 vs 70 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Ultra stands out on Display Pixel density: 510 PPI (39% more), Display Refresh rate: 144 Hz (20% more), Display Screen-to-body ratio: 90.3%.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads overall
Vivo X300 Ultra
77
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
70
Why it stands out
- Display Pixel density: 510 PPI (39% more)
- Display Refresh rate: 144 Hz (20% more)
- Display Screen-to-body ratio: 90.3%
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a high-end flagship smartphone designed for mobile photography enthusiasts and power users looking for professional-grade imaging capabilities. It is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor paired with LPDDR5X memory, featuring a large 6.82-inch 144Hz LTPO AMOLED display and an advanced multi-sensor camera array anchored by a 200MP main sensor and a 200MP periscope telephoto lens.
Best for long-range and telephoto mobile photographyBest for high-frame-rate 4K and 8K video captureBest for all-day heavy multimedia usage
Pros
- Extensive multi-focal length camera setup featuring high-resolution 200MP main and telephoto sensors with OIS
- High-capacity 6600mAh battery supporting 100W wired and 40W wireless charging
- Vibrant 6.82-inch LTPO AMOLED display with adaptive 1-144Hz refresh rate and Dolby Vision support
- Robust performance driven by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip and UFS 4.1 storage
Cons
- Bulky physical footprint with a weight of 232g or more depending on the finish
- Lacks expandable storage via a microSD card slot
- Absence of a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a premium book-style foldable smartphone running on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, designed for users who want a hybrid phone-and-tablet experience. It features an expansive 8.0-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X internal display and a high-resolution 200 MP main rear camera. The device offers a thinner profile and lighter frame than typical foldables, targeting productivity-minded users who require a portable workstation.
Best for Multi-window multitasking and productivity with One UI featuresBest for Immersive mobile media consumption and gaming on a large, high-refresh-rate…Best for Users who want a foldable phone that is durable enough for long-term daily wear
Pros
- Slim 4.2 mm unfolded profile and lightweight 215g design
- Extremely bright 8.0-inch internal screen peaking at 2600 nits
- High-tier performance via the Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC and up to 16GB of RAM
- IP48 rating adding solid particle and water resistance
Cons
- Slow 25W wired charging capability compared to rival flagships
- Real-world battery longevity and camera consistency can be frustrating during daily usage
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Ultra2,723,497
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 71,995,132
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Ultra6,600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 74,400 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Vivo X300 Ultra is 17 g (8%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Vivo X300 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are compared side by side above across every spec in the smartphones category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 83/100 for Vivo X300 Ultra and 79/100 for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7.
If you want the higher-rated smartphones option overall, Vivo X300 Ultra (83/100) edges out Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (79/100). But if Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Vivo X300
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Vivo X100 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
Samsung Galaxy S26
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
VS