Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi 17 Ultra overall by 19 points (89 vs 70 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Chip Model: MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Storage capacity: 1,024 GB, Display Resolution: 1260 × 2800 px.
Vivo X300 Pro leads overall
Vivo X300 Pro
89
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
70
Why it stands out
- Chip Model: MediaTek Dimensity 9500
- Storage capacity: 1,024 GB
- Display Resolution: 1260 × 2800 px
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro is a flagship smartphone designed for power users who prioritize high-end mobile photography and robust battery life. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor and features a brilliant 6.78-inch LTPO OLED display. With its heavy-duty zoom camera and robust water protection, it aims to compete at the very top of the premium market.
Best for High-detail zoom and close-up macro mobile photographyBest for Outdoor enthusiasts needing a highly water-resistant device with a very bright sBest for Power users wanting high-speed 90W wired charging paired with strong overall bat
Pros
- Highly advanced triple-lens camera setup featuring a 200 MP periscope telephoto sensor
- Generous 6510 mAh battery capacity on the global variant for extended multi-day use
- Superb outdoor visibility with a display that peaks at 4500 nits
- Dual IP68 and IP69 ratings offering protection against both immersion and high-pressure water jets
Cons
- Relatively heavy in the hand, weighing 226 grams
- European model gets a substantially smaller 5440 mAh battery compared to the global version
- Lacks support for expandable storage options
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a premium, camera-focused flagship smartphone designed for mobile photography purists and power users. Running on Xiaomi's HyperOS, the device stands out with its massive rear camera array and extensive Leica branding.
Best for Enthusiasts seeking advanced mobile photography with Leica color tuningBest for Users who want a premium global smartphone with top-tier screen and battery perf
Pros
- Highly capable camera system with deep Leica integration and versatile shooting parameters
- Runs on the refined HyperOS platform with global market availability
- High-quality display, strong audio performance, and dependable battery life
Cons
- The massive physical size of the camera module dominates the rear design, making it feel more like a dedicated camera than a traditional phone
- Camera interface requires diving into menus to preserve custom resolution and shooting parameters between sessions
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Pro3,583,003
Xiaomi 17 Ultra3,850,000
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Xiaomi 17 Ultra6,000 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro is 8 g (4%) heavier than Xiaomi 17 Ultra.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side