LG QNED85A 65 vs Sony Bravia 5 65

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Sony Bravia 5 65 and LG QNED85A 65 are closely matched at 69 and 67/100. The Sony Bravia 5 65 edges ahead on HDR, while the LG QNED85A 65 leads on Gaming — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Sony Bravia 5 65 and LG QNED85A 65 are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
  • LG QNED85A 65 counters with Gaming Refresh Rate (VRR Max): 144 Hz (20% more).
Sony Bravia 5 65 and LG QNED85A 65 are closely matched
Sony Bravia 5 65
69
LG QNED85A 65
67
Where LG QNED85A 65 stands out
  • Gaming Refresh Rate (VRR Max): 144 Hz (20% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

LG QNED85A 65

The LG QNED85A (65-inch model) is a 4K smart TV that pairs MiniLED backlighting with quantum dot color technology for enhanced brightness and contrast. Driven by the Alpha 8 AI Processor Gen2, it provides automated image and audio optimization alongside 4K upscaling. Equipped with a native 120Hz refresh rate and LG's webOS platform, it is designed for users wanting smooth motion handling for gaming and movie watching.

Best for High-frame-rate console gaming requiring low latency and 120Hz supportBest for Bright living rooms where MiniLED backlighting and strong color output are neede
Pros
  • MiniLED backlighting with Dimming Pro enables fine-grained contrast management
  • Native 120Hz refresh rate provides smooth motion for gaming and fast action
  • Alpha 8 AI Processor Gen2 powers real-time image and audio enhancements
  • High color fidelity with 100% color volume coverage
Cons
  • Supports HDR10 Pro but lacks Dolby Vision support

Sony Bravia 5 65

The Sony Bravia 5 65 is a 65-inch 4K Mini-LED LCD television aimed at modern home theater setups and gaming configurations. Driven by Sony's Cognitive Processor XR, it features local dimming along with a native 120Hz refresh rate and Dolby Vision HDR support. Operating on the Google TV smart platform, this television also provides low-latency gaming capabilities via Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) and Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM).

Best for Smooth 4K console gaming at 120Hz with variable refresh ratesBest for Streaming Dolby Vision HDR film and television content via Google TV
Pros
  • Mini-LED panel equipped with local dimming for improved contrast management
  • Cognitive Processor XR delivers advanced picture processing
  • Native 120Hz display with VRR and ALLM for responsive gaming
  • Modern connectivity including Wi-Fi 6 support
Cons
  • Fairly heavy display weight of 24.9 kg without the stand
  • Panel depth of 5.8 cm creates a slightly thicker profile when wall-mounted

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Sony Bravia 5 65

Physical Comparison

Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D

22.5 kg24.9 kg
LG QNED85A 65Sony Bravia 5 65

Sony Bravia 5 65 is 2.4 kg (11%) heavier than LG QNED85A 65.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LG QNED85A 65 vs Sony Bravia 5 65 comparison

They are closely matched: LG QNED85A 65 scores 78/100 and Sony Bravia 5 65 scores 78/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
LG QNED85A 65 and Sony Bravia 5 65 are compared side by side above across every spec in the tvs category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 78/100 for LG QNED85A 65 and 78/100 for Sony Bravia 5 65.
It's close — LG QNED85A 65 (78/100) and Sony Bravia 5 65 (78/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote