Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R6 V
VS
Canon EOS R3 vs Canon EOS R8 Mark II
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
Verdict
Key takeaways
- Canon EOS R3 leads Canon EOS R8 Mark II overall by 17 points (76 vs 59 out of 100).
- Key differences: max video resolution, where Canon EOS R3 has 6000 × 3164 vs 3840 × 2160 px; max video frame rate, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 180 vs 60 fps; burst speed (electronic), where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 40 vs 30 fps; battery life (CIPA shots), where Canon EOS R3 has 860 vs 340; weight, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II is 469 g lighter.
- Best value: Canon EOS R8 Mark II (from $1,899) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Canon EOS R3 leads overall
Canon EOS R3 · 78 overall, #7 of 39
76
Canon EOS R8 Mark II · 66 overall, #20 of 39
59
Key differences
- Max Video ResolutionCanon EOS R3 6000 × 3164 vs 3840 × 2160 px
- Max Video Frame RateCanon EOS R8 Mark II 180 vs 60 fps
- Burst SpeedCanon EOS R8 Mark II 40 vs 30 fps
- Battery LifeCanon EOS R3 860 vs 340
- WeightCanon EOS R8 Mark II 469 g lighter
Scores by Category
EOS R3 wins 5 of 7 categories
| Category | EOS R3EOS R8 Mark II | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | Tie | |
| Autofocus | +100 | |
| Video | +6 | |
| Performance | +6 | |
| Connectivity & Storage | +100 | |
| Physical & Battery | Tie | |
| Display & Viewfinder | +52 |
Physical Comparison
EOS R3EOS R8 Mark II
EOS R3 is 469 g (86%) heavier than EOS R8 Mark II.
Value for Money
Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).
EOS R8 Mark II
Detailed Specifications
Sensor
| Feature | EOS R3 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Sensor Size | ||
Megapixels | 24.1 MP | 24.2 MP |
Image Stabilization (IBIS) | Yes | Yes |
ISO Max | 102,400 | 102,400 |
Autofocus
| Feature | EOS R3 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
AF Points | 1,053 | N/A |
Video
| Feature | EOS R3 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 6000 × 3164 px | 3840 × 2160 px |
Max Video Frame Rate | 60 fps | 180 fps200% more |
Video Bit Depth | 10 | 10 |
Performance
| Feature | EOS R3 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Burst Speed (mechanical) | 12 fps | N/A |
Burst Speed (electronic) | 30 fps | 40 fps33% more |
Display & Viewfinder
| Feature | EOS R3 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
LCD Size | 3.2 in7% more | 3 in |
LCD Resolution | 4,150,000156% more | 1,620,000 |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5,760,000144% more | 2,360,000 |
Connectivity & Storage
| Feature | EOS R3 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Dual Card Slots | Yes | N/A |
Weather Sealing | Yes | N/A |
Physical & Battery
| Feature | EOS R3 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Weight | 1,015 g | 546 g46% less |
Battery Life (CIPA shots) | 860153% more | 340 |
Dimensions | 15.0 × 14.26 × 8.72 cm | 13.14 × 9.00 × 7.97 cm |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.
Review Videos
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Canon EOS R6 V
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R5
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R8
VS
Canon EOS R8
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS