Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Canon EOS R6 V
VS
Canon EOS R6 V vs Canon EOS R8 Mark II
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
Verdict
Key takeaways
- Canon EOS R6 V leads Canon EOS R8 Mark II overall by 19 points (74 vs 55 out of 100).
- Key differences: max video resolution, where Canon EOS R6 V has 6960 × 4640 vs 3840 × 2160 px; ISO max, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 102,400 vs 64,000; megapixels, where Canon EOS R6 V has 32.5 vs 24.2 MP; battery life (CIPA shots), where Canon EOS R6 V has 640 vs 340; video bit depth, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 10 vs 12.
Canon EOS R6 V leads overall
Canon EOS R6 V · 84 overall, #1 of 39
74
Canon EOS R8 Mark II · 66 overall, #20 of 39
55
Key differences
- Max Video ResolutionCanon EOS R6 V 6960 × 4640 vs 3840 × 2160 px
- ISO MaxCanon EOS R8 Mark II 102,400 vs 64,000
- MegapixelsCanon EOS R6 V 32.5 vs 24.2 MP
- Battery LifeCanon EOS R6 V 640 vs 340
- Video Bit DepthCanon EOS R8 Mark II 10 vs 12
Scores by Category
EOS R6 V wins 4 of 7 categories · EOS R8 Mark II wins 1
| Category | EOS R6 VEOS R8 Mark II | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | Tie | |
| Autofocus | +100 | |
| Video | +38 | |
| Performance | Tie | |
| Connectivity & Storage | +100 | |
| Physical & Battery | +20 | |
| Display & Viewfinder | +8 |
Physical Comparison
EOS R6 VEOS R8 Mark II
EOS R6 V is 52 g (10%) heavier than EOS R8 Mark II.
Value for Money
Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).
EOS R6 V
EOS R8 Mark II
Detailed Specifications
Sensor
| Feature | EOS R6 V | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Sensor Size | ||
Megapixels | 32.5 MP34% more | 24.2 MP |
Image Stabilization (IBIS) | Yes | Yes |
ISO Max | 64,000 | 102,40060% more |
Autofocus
| Feature | EOS R6 V | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
AF Points | 1,053 | N/A |
Video
| Feature | EOS R6 V | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 6960 × 4640 px | 3840 × 2160 px |
Max Video Frame Rate | 180 fps | 180 fps |
Video Bit Depth | 12 | 1017% less |
Performance
| Feature | EOS R6 V | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Burst Speed (electronic) | 40 fps | 40 fps |
Display & Viewfinder
| Feature | EOS R6 V | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
LCD Size | 3 in | 3 in |
LCD Resolution | 1,620,000 | 1,620,000 |
Viewfinder Resolution | 0 | 2,360,000 |
Articulating Screen | Yes | N/A |
Connectivity & Storage
| Feature | EOS R6 V | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Dual Card Slots | Yes | N/A |
Weather Sealing | Yes | N/A |
Physical & Battery
| Feature | EOS R6 V | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Weight | 598 g | 546 g9% less |
Battery Life (CIPA shots) | 64088% more | 340 |
Dimensions | 14.18 × 8.33 × 7.97 cm | 13.14 × 9.00 × 7.97 cm |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.
Review Videos
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Canon EOS R6 V
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R6 V
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R6 V
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon EOS R6 V
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 V
Canon EOS R8
VS
Canon EOS R8
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS