Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R6 V
VS
Canon EOS R5 vs Canon EOS R8 Mark II
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
Verdict
Key takeaways
- Canon EOS R5 leads Canon EOS R8 Mark II overall by 17 points (76 vs 59 out of 100).
- Key differences: max video resolution, where Canon EOS R5 has 8192 × 4320 vs 3840 × 2160 px; max video frame rate, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 180 vs 120 fps; burst speed (electronic), where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 40 vs 20 fps; megapixels, where Canon EOS R5 has 45 vs 24.2 MP; ISO max, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 102,400 vs 51,200.
- Best value: Canon EOS R8 Mark II (from $1,899) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Canon EOS R5 leads overall
Canon EOS R5 · 80 overall, #4 of 39
76
Canon EOS R8 Mark II · 66 overall, #20 of 39
59
Key differences
- Max Video ResolutionCanon EOS R5 8192 × 4320 vs 3840 × 2160 px
- Max Video Frame RateCanon EOS R8 Mark II 180 vs 120 fps
- Burst SpeedCanon EOS R8 Mark II 40 vs 20 fps
- MegapixelsCanon EOS R5 45 vs 24.2 MP
- ISO MaxCanon EOS R8 Mark II 102,400 vs 51,200
Scores by Category
EOS R5 wins 4 of 7 categories · EOS R8 Mark II wins 1
| Category | EOS R5EOS R8 Mark II | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | Tie | |
| Autofocus | +100 | |
| Video | +28 | |
| Performance | +15 | |
| Connectivity & Storage | +100 | |
| Physical & Battery | Tie | |
| Display & Viewfinder | +39 |
Physical Comparison
EOS R5EOS R8 Mark II
EOS R5 is 192 g (35%) heavier than EOS R8 Mark II.
Value for Money
Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).
EOS R8 Mark II
Detailed Specifications
Sensor
| Feature | EOS R5 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Sensor Size | ||
Megapixels | 45 MP86% more | 24.2 MP |
Image Stabilization (IBIS) | Yes | Yes |
ISO Max | 51,200 | 102,400100% more |
Autofocus
| Feature | EOS R5 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
AF Points | 1,053 | N/A |
Video
| Feature | EOS R5 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 8192 × 4320 px | 3840 × 2160 px |
Max Video Frame Rate | 120 fps | 180 fps50% more |
Video Bit Depth | 12 | 1017% less |
Performance
| Feature | EOS R5 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Burst Speed (mechanical) | 12 fps | N/A |
Burst Speed (electronic) | 20 fps | 40 fps100% more |
Display & Viewfinder
| Feature | EOS R5 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
LCD Size | 3.2 in7% more | 3 in |
LCD Resolution | 2,100,00030% more | 1,620,000 |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5,760,000144% more | 2,360,000 |
Connectivity & Storage
| Feature | EOS R5 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Dual Card Slots | Yes | N/A |
Weather Sealing | Yes | N/A |
Physical & Battery
| Feature | EOS R5 | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Weight | 738 g | 546 g26% less |
Battery Life (CIPA shots) | 49044% more | 340 |
Dimensions | 13.85 × 9.75 × 8.8 cm | 13.14 × 9.00 × 7.97 cm |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.
Review Videos
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Canon EOS R6 V
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R5
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R8
VS
Canon EOS R8
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS