AMD EPYC 74F3 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 74F3 is the better pick — it scores 82/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3365's 70, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3365 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 74F3 leads overall

AMD EPYC 74F3

Intel Xeon W 3365

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (433% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.2 GHz (19% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 74F3 vs Intel Xeon W 3365
Category	AMD EPYC 74F3	Intel Xeon W 3365	Winner
Core Specifications	78	50	AMD EPYC 74F3
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	84	80	AMD EPYC 74F3

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 74F3

The AMD EPYC 74F3 is a server and workstation-class processor featuring 24 cores and 48 threads built on a 7nm process. Released in early 2021, it delivers base clock speeds of 3.2 GHz with boost frequencies reaching up to 4.0 GHz alongside a massive 256 MB L3 cache. It is designed for enterprise and workstation environments that demand high frequency per core and significant cache availability for compute-heavy applications.

Best for High-performance workstation tasks that require strong single-thread boost clockBest for Enterprise multithreaded server workloads benefiting from steady 24-core paralle

Pros

High peak clock speeds up to 4.0 GHz alongside a steady 3.2 GHz base frequency
Large 256 MB L3 cache buffer to optimize data-intensive and latency-sensitive tasks
Strong multithreaded performance output with 24 cores and 48 threads

Cons

High 240W thermal design power (TDP) demands robust enterprise cooling solutions
No integrated graphics processor, requiring a discrete GPU for display output
Locked multiplier prevents manual clock speed adjustment

Intel Xeon W 3365

This is a listing of Intel Xeon processors, cataloging models by their generation and architecture (Source 1). The list serves as a comprehensive resource detailing various Xeon lines for system builders and researchers needing historical product information.

Best for reference buildingBest for historical tech review

Pros

Provides a chronological overview of different processor generations
Classifies processors by core-based versus NetBurst-based architectures
Details numerous models across several architectural eras (e.g., P6, Core, Nehalem)

Cons

The source is purely a massive list and does not offer detailed specifications for any single product
Only listing the inclusion of model names and their processor generation/architecture

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 74F3

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon W 3365

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 74F360,666

Intel Xeon W 336557,312

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 74F3	Intel Xeon W 3365
Cores	24	32
Threads	48	64
Base Frequency	3.2 GHz19% more	2.7 GHz
Base Power Consumption	240 W	270 W13% more
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	N/A
L1 Cache	N/A	2,560 KB
L2 Cache	N/A	40 MB
L3 Cache	256 MB433% more	48 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm30% less	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 74F3	Intel Xeon W 3365
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 74F3	Intel Xeon W 3365
PassMark CPU Mark	60,6666% more	57,312

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 74F3 vs Intel Xeon W 3365 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 74F3 scores 84/100 and Intel Xeon W 3365 scores 84/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 74F3 and Intel Xeon W 3365 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for AMD EPYC 74F3 and 84/100 for Intel Xeon W 3365.

It's close — AMD EPYC 74F3 (84/100) and Intel Xeon W 3365 (84/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.