AMD EPYC 7513 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7513 is the better pick — it scores 76/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3365's 68, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3365 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7513 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7513

Intel Xeon W 3365

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (167% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7513 vs Intel Xeon W 3365
Category	AMD EPYC 7513	Intel Xeon W 3365	Winner
Core Specifications	64	42	AMD EPYC 7513
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	82	81	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7513

The AMD EPYC 7513 is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor manufactured on a 7nm process. Designed for enterprise data centers and virtualization hosts, it delivers multithreaded performance with a 2.6 GHz base clock speed that can boost up to 3.7 GHz.

Best for High-density server deployments running virtualized environmentsBest for Enterprise data centers requiring multithreaded compute efficiency

Pros

High parallel processing capacity with 32 cores and 64 threads
Substantial 128 MB L3 cache to assist memory-bound server workloads
Manageable thermal footprint operating between a 165W base and 200W maximum power draw

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics, requiring dedicated display hardware for direct console management
Locked multiplier prevents manual clock tuning or custom frequency adjustments

Intel Xeon W 3365

This is a listing of Intel Xeon processors, cataloging models by their generation and architecture (Source 1). The list serves as a comprehensive resource detailing various Xeon lines for system builders and researchers needing historical product information.

Best for reference buildingBest for historical tech review

Pros

Provides a chronological overview of different processor generations
Classifies processors by core-based versus NetBurst-based architectures
Details numerous models across several architectural eras (e.g., P6, Core, Nehalem)

Cons

The source is purely a massive list and does not offer detailed specifications for any single product
Only listing the inclusion of model names and their processor generation/architecture

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7513

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon W 3365

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 751358,964

Intel Xeon W 336557,312

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7513	Intel Xeon W 3365
Cores	32	32
Threads	64	64
Base Frequency	2.6 GHz	2.7 GHz4% more
Base Power Consumption	200 W	270 W35% more
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz	4 GHz8% more
Maximum Power Consumption	200 W	N/A
L1 Cache	2,048 KB	2,560 KB25% more
L2 Cache	16 MB	40 MB150% more
L3 Cache	128 MB167% more	48 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm30% less	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7513	Intel Xeon W 3365
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7513	Intel Xeon W 3365
PassMark CPU Mark	58,9643% more	57,312

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7513 vs Intel Xeon W 3365 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7513 scores 85/100 and Intel Xeon W 3365 scores 84/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 7513 and Intel Xeon W 3365 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for AMD EPYC 7513 and 84/100 for Intel Xeon W 3365.

It's close — AMD EPYC 7513 (85/100) and Intel Xeon W 3365 (84/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.