Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M vs Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and Intel Xeon Gold 6278C are closely matched at 59 and 59/100. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M edges ahead on Benchmark, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6278C leads on Core Specifications — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and Intel Xeon Gold 6278C are closely matched

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

Where Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 3.9 GHz (11% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 34,592 (5% more)

Where Intel Xeon Gold 6278C stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 26
Core Specifications Threads: 52
Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 185 W (12% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M vs Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
Category	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C	Winner
Core Specifications	47	53	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	65	62	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

The Intel Xeon Platinum series represents a line of high-end microprocessors. These CPUs are listed within the broader categorization of Intel Xeon processors by generation.

Best for High performance computingBest for Enterprise applications

Pros

Platinum is mentioned as a class of processor in multiple generations (e.g., Skylake-based, Comet Lake-based, Ice Lake-based)

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

The Intel Xeon Gold 6278C is one of a long list of generation-specific Intel Xeon microprocessors. These processors are designed for enterprise and data center applications, supporting various compute loads.

Best for Data CenterBest for Enterprise Compute

Pros

Supports the Gold tier designation (Source 1)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M34,592

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C32,835

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
Cores	24	26
Threads	48	52
Base Frequency	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz8% more
Base Power Consumption	165 W	185 W12% more
Maximum Frequency	3.9 GHz11% more	3.5 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	N/A	1,664 KB
L2 Cache	24 MB	26 MB8% more
L3 Cache	35.75 MB	35.75 MB
Lithography Process	14 nm	14 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
PassMark CPU Mark	34,5925% more	32,835

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M vs Intel Xeon Gold 6278C comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 66/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6278C scores 65/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and Intel Xeon Gold 6278C are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 66/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and 65/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6278C.

It's close — Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (66/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6278C (65/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.