Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C is the better pick — it scores 68/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U's 65, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C and Intel Xeon Gold 6314U are closely matched

Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Where Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 36
Core Specifications Threads: 72
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 2,880 KB (13% more)

Where Intel Xeon Gold 6314U stands out

Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.3 GHz (10% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Category	Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U	Winner
Core Specifications	51	45	Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	76	76	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C

The Intel Xeon Platinum processor line appears in the Ice Lake-based family of CPUs. This type of processor, along with other available variants, is used for high-demand computational tasks characteristic of server and data center environments.

Best for Server computingBest for Data centers

Pros

Supports dual processor configuration
Part of the Ice Lake-based Xeon series

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U is an Ice Lake-based processor listed in a general series overview of Intel Xeon chips. Its specifications are presented on a list detailing processors for various compute roles, such as cloud or data center use.

Best for general compute

Pros

Features 32 cores and 64 threads
Equipped with 48 MB L3 cache
Has an LGA 4189 socket interface on the Ice Lake-W variant

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C49,386

Intel Xeon Gold 6314U48,916

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Cores	36	32
Threads	72	64
Base Frequency	2.1 GHz	2.3 GHz10% more
Base Power Consumption	210 W	205 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz3% more	3.4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,880 KB13% more	2,560 KB
L2 Cache	45 MB13% more	40 MB
L3 Cache	54 MB13% more	48 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	10 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
PassMark CPU Mark	49,386	48,916

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C scores 80/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6314U scores 79/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C and Intel Xeon Gold 6314U are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 80/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C and 79/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6314U.

It's close — Intel Xeon Platinum 8347C (80/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6314U (79/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.