Nikon Z6 III
Nikon ZR
VS
Canon EOS R8 Mark II vs Nikon ZR
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
Verdict
Key takeaways
- Nikon ZR leads Canon EOS R8 Mark II overall by 12 points (71 vs 59 out of 100).
- Key differences: max video resolution, where Nikon ZR has 6048 × 3402 vs 3840 × 2160 px; burst speed (electronic), where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 40 vs 20 fps; max video frame rate, where Nikon ZR has 240 vs 180 fps; ISO max, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 102,400 vs 51,200; video bit depth, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 10 vs 12.
Nikon ZR leads overall
Nikon ZR · 63 overall, #24 of 39
71
Canon EOS R8 Mark II · 66 overall, #20 of 39
59
Key differences
- Max Video ResolutionNikon ZR 6048 × 3402 vs 3840 × 2160 px
- Burst SpeedCanon EOS R8 Mark II 40 vs 20 fps
- Max Video Frame RateNikon ZR 240 vs 180 fps
- ISO MaxCanon EOS R8 Mark II 102,400 vs 51,200
- Video Bit DepthCanon EOS R8 Mark II 10 vs 12
Scores by Category
Nikon ZR wins 5 of 7 categories · EOS R8 Mark II wins 2
| Category | EOS R8 Mark IINikon ZR | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | +6 | |
| Autofocus | +100 | |
| Video | +44 | |
| Performance | +54 | |
| Connectivity & Storage | +100 | |
| Physical & Battery | +22 | |
| Display & Viewfinder | +14 |
Physical Comparison
EOS R8 Mark IINikon ZR
Nikon ZR is 84 g (15%) heavier than EOS R8 Mark II.
Value for Money
Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).
EOS R8 Mark II
Nikon ZR
Detailed Specifications
Sensor
| Feature | EOS R8 Mark II | Nikon ZR |
|---|---|---|
Sensor Size | ||
Megapixels | 24.2 MP | 24.5 MP |
Image Stabilization (IBIS) | Yes | Yes |
ISO Max | 102,400100% more | 51,200 |
Autofocus
| Feature | EOS R8 Mark II | Nikon ZR |
|---|---|---|
AF Points | N/A | 299 |
Video
| Feature | EOS R8 Mark II | Nikon ZR |
|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 3840 × 2160 px | 6048 × 3402 px |
Max Video Frame Rate | 180 fps | 240 fps33% more |
Video Bit Depth | 1017% less | 12 |
Performance
| Feature | EOS R8 Mark II | Nikon ZR |
|---|---|---|
Burst Speed (electronic) | 40 fps100% more | 20 fps |
Display & Viewfinder
| Feature | EOS R8 Mark II | Nikon ZR |
|---|---|---|
LCD Size | 3 in | 4 in33% more |
LCD Resolution | 1,620,000 | 3,070,00090% more |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 | 0 |
Articulating Screen | N/A | Yes |
Connectivity & Storage
| Feature | EOS R8 Mark II | Nikon ZR |
|---|---|---|
Dual Card Slots | N/A | Yes |
Weather Sealing | N/A | Yes |
Physical & Battery
| Feature | EOS R8 Mark II | Nikon ZR |
|---|---|---|
Weight | 546 g13% less | 630 g |
Battery Life (CIPA shots) | 340 | 3709% more |
Dimensions | 13.14 × 9.00 × 7.97 cm | 13.4 × 8.05 × 4.9 cm |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.
Review Videos
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Canon EOS R6 V
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Nikon Z8
Nikon ZR
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Nikon Zf
Nikon ZR
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Nikon Z5 II
Nikon ZR
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Nikon Z5IIC
Nikon ZR
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Nikon Z50 II
Nikon ZR
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS