OM System OM-1 Mark II
OM System OM-3
VS
OM System OM-1 Mark II vs Canon EOS R8 Mark II
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
Verdict
Key takeaways
- OM System OM-1 Mark II leads Canon EOS R8 Mark II overall by 18 points (72 vs 54 out of 100).
- Key differences: sensor size, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has Full Frame vs Micro Four Thirds; max video frame rate, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 180 vs 60 fps; burst speed (electronic), where OM System OM-1 Mark II has 120 vs 40 fps; ISO max, where Canon EOS R8 Mark II has 102,400 vs 25,600; battery life (CIPA shots), where OM System OM-1 Mark II has 520 vs 340.
OM System OM-1 Mark II leads overall
OM System OM-1 Mark II · 69 overall, #17 of 39
72
Canon EOS R8 Mark II · 66 overall, #20 of 39
54
Key differences
- Sensor SizeCanon EOS R8 Mark II Full Frame vs Micro Four Thirds
- Max Video Frame RateCanon EOS R8 Mark II 180 vs 60 fps
- Burst SpeedOM System OM-1 Mark II 120 vs 40 fps
- ISO MaxCanon EOS R8 Mark II 102,400 vs 25,600
- Battery LifeOM System OM-1 Mark II 520 vs 340
Scores by Category
OM-1 Mark II wins 5 of 7 categories · EOS R8 Mark II wins 2
| Category | OM-1 Mark IIEOS R8 Mark II | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | +28 | |
| Autofocus | +100 | |
| Video | +20 | |
| Performance | +79 | |
| Connectivity & Storage | +100 | |
| Physical & Battery | +14 | |
| Display & Viewfinder | +31 |
Physical Comparison
OM-1 Mark IIEOS R8 Mark II
OM-1 Mark II is 53 g (10%) heavier than EOS R8 Mark II.
Value for Money
Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).
OM-1 Mark II
EOS R8 Mark II
Detailed Specifications
Sensor
| Feature | OM-1 Mark II | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Sensor Size | ||
Megapixels | 20.4 MP | 24.2 MP19% more |
Image Stabilization (IBIS) | Yes | Yes |
ISO Max | 25,600 | 102,400300% more |
Autofocus
| Feature | OM-1 Mark II | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
AF Points | 1,053 | N/A |
Video
| Feature | OM-1 Mark II | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 4096 × 2160 px | 3840 × 2160 px |
Max Video Frame Rate | 60 fps | 180 fps200% more |
Video Bit Depth | 10 | 10 |
Performance
| Feature | OM-1 Mark II | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Burst Speed (mechanical) | 10 fps | N/A |
Burst Speed (electronic) | 120 fps200% more | 40 fps |
Display & Viewfinder
| Feature | OM-1 Mark II | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
LCD Size | 3 in | 3 in |
LCD Resolution | 1,620,000 | 1,620,000 |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5,760,000144% more | 2,360,000 |
Connectivity & Storage
| Feature | OM-1 Mark II | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Dual Card Slots | Yes | N/A |
Weather Sealing | Yes | N/A |
Physical & Battery
| Feature | OM-1 Mark II | EOS R8 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
Weight | 599 g | 546 g9% less |
Battery Life (CIPA shots) | 52053% more | 340 |
Dimensions | 13.88 × 9.16 × 7.27 cm | 13.14 × 9.00 × 7.97 cm |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.
Review Videos
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Canon EOS R6 V
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R3
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R8
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R50 V
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 V
OM System OM-1 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
OM System OM-1 Mark II
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
OM System OM-1 Mark II
VS