Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs AMD EPYC 7443

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7443 is the better pick — it scores 76/100 to the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C's 69, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD EPYC 7443 leads Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C overall by 7 points (76 vs 69 out of 100).
  • AMD EPYC 7443 stands out on Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (137% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less), Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (14% more).
AMD EPYC 7443 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7443
76
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
69
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (137% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
  • Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (14% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

AMD EPYC 7443

The AMD EPYC 7443 is a 24-core, 48-thread enterprise processor designed for server and high-performance workstation platforms. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it offers a base clock speed of 2.9 GHz alongside a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz and 128 MB of L3 cache. With a fixed power consumption profile of 200W, it delivers substantial parallel computing throughput for data-intensive business environments.

Best for Server virtualization and high-density enterprise container deploymentBest for Heavily multi-threaded technical workloads and data processing pipelines
Pros
  • High multi-threaded performance supported by 24 cores and 48 threads
  • Large 128 MB L3 cache aids memory-sensitive compute workloads
  • Reaches boost clock speeds up to 4.0 GHz within a modest 200W power envelope
Cons
  • No integrated graphics capability, requiring a discrete GPU or management controller for display output
  • Locked clock multiplier restricts manual performance tuning or overclocking

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202
AMD EPYC 744356,884

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs AMD EPYC 7443 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C scores 84/100 and AMD EPYC 7443 scores 83/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and AMD EPYC 7443 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7443.
It's close — Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) and AMD EPYC 7443 (83/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote