Intel Xeon W 3375 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

Verdict

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon W 3375 leads Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX overall by 10 points (76 vs 66 out of 100).
  • Key differences: L3 cache, where Intel Xeon W 3375 has 57 MB vs 36 MB; L2 cache, where Intel Xeon W 3375 has 47.5 MB vs 40 MB; cores, where Intel Xeon W 3375 has 38 vs 24; threads, where Intel Xeon W 3375 has 76 vs 24; base power consumption, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX has 55 vs 270 W.
Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall
Intel Xeon W 3375 · 85 overall, #27 of 470
76
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX · 82 overall, #41 of 470
66
Key differences
  • L3 CacheIntel Xeon W 3375 57 MB vs 36 MB
  • L2 CacheIntel Xeon W 3375 47.5 MB vs 40 MB
  • CoresIntel Xeon W 3375 38 vs 24
  • ThreadsIntel Xeon W 3375 76 vs 24
  • Base Power ConsumptionIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX 55 vs 270 W

Scores by Category

Evenly split — each wins 1 of 3 categories

CategoryXeon W 3375Core Ultra 9 285HXLead
Benchmark
Tie
Core Specifications
+20
Integrated Graphics
+44

Value for Money

Enter today's price for each product (same currency for all).

Detailed Specifications

Core Specifications

Feature
Xeon W 3375
Core Ultra 9 285HX
Cores
38
24
Threads
76
24
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz12% more
Base Power Consumption
270 W
55 W80% less
Maximum Frequency
4 GHz
5.5 GHz38% more
L1 Cache
3,040 KB25% more
2,432 KB
L2 Cache
47.5 MB19% more
40 MB
L3 Cache
57 MB58% more
36 MB
Lithography Process
10 nm
N/A
Is unlocked
No
N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature
Xeon W 3375
Core Ultra 9 285HX
Model
N/A

Benchmark

Feature
Xeon W 3375
Core Ultra 9 285HX
PassMark CPU Mark
58,6864% more
56,272

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote