Intel Xeon W 3365 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

Verdict

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon W 3365 leads Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX overall by 6 points (74 vs 68 out of 100).
  • Key differences: L3 cache, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 48 MB vs 36 MB; threads, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 64 vs 24; base power consumption, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX has 55 vs 270 W; maximum frequency, where Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX has 5.5 vs 4 GHz; cores, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 32 vs 24.
Intel Xeon W 3365 leads overall
Intel Xeon W 3365 · 84 overall, #32 of 470
74
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX · 82 overall, #41 of 470
68
Key differences
  • L3 CacheIntel Xeon W 3365 48 MB vs 36 MB
  • ThreadsIntel Xeon W 3365 64 vs 24
  • Base Power ConsumptionIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX 55 vs 270 W
  • Maximum FrequencyIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX 5.5 vs 4 GHz
  • CoresIntel Xeon W 3365 32 vs 24

Scores by Category

Evenly split — each wins 1 of 3 categories

CategoryXeon W 3365Core Ultra 9 285HXLead
Benchmark
Tie
Core Specifications
+10
Integrated Graphics
+44

Value for Money

Enter today's price for each product (same currency for all).

Detailed Specifications

Core Specifications

Feature
Xeon W 3365
Core Ultra 9 285HX
Cores
32
24
Threads
64
24
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz4% more
Base Power Consumption
270 W
55 W80% less
Maximum Frequency
4 GHz
5.5 GHz38% more
L1 Cache
2,560 KB5% more
2,432 KB
L2 Cache
40 MB
40 MB
L3 Cache
48 MB33% more
36 MB
Lithography Process
10 nm
N/A
Is unlocked
No
N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature
Xeon W 3365
Core Ultra 9 285HX
Model
N/A

Benchmark

Feature
Xeon W 3365
Core Ultra 9 285HX
PassMark CPU Mark
57,312
56,272

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote